WebAIM’s Hierarchy for Motivating Accessibility Change

Today, in every aspect of the post-secondary experience, institutions are employing technology.   Although innovation and equal access can go hand in hand,  designing  technology accessibly has not been commonplace.  Consequently, higher education has struggled with how to address issues of access for students with disabilities  while making use of the best of technology to provide effective and innovative instruction as well as access to an institution’s programs and services.

OCR has made it clear that using technology, especially emerging technology in a classroom environment when the technology is inaccessible to an entire population of individuals with disabilities is discriminatory.

More recently, the Resolution Agreement with  UC-Berkley, the compliance review of the  South Carolina Technical College System and the settlement  agreement with Louisiana Tech University, have each highlighted the obligation to ensure access. The message is inescapable — accessibility must be considered when selecting, implementing and  using technology in the classroom and elsewhere in the institution.
Continue reading “WebAIM’s Hierarchy for Motivating Accessibility Change”

Useability vs. Accessibility

Recently I read an article, Usability vs. Accessibility which was included  in the December issue of the WebAim newsletter.

The  article discusses the two concepts usability and accessibility as they pertain to websites and website design.  Although I thought the writing style was clunky and not particularly readable, especially by a non-techie, the author made some important points, with the most concise and pertinent point being  this one:

. . .Usability is mostly about the methods of making the navigation more facile while accessibility is about making the navigation possible for everyone. The difference is simple: a usable website is “user-friendly” while an accessible website is “all users-friendly.”

Food for thought indeed.